JEFF MANCHUR: PIANIST
  • Home
  • Biography
  • Pianist
    • Praying with Bach
    • Why Mozart Matters
    • Choosing Joy
    • Audio and Video
    • Repertoire
  • Blogger
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Biography
  • Pianist
    • Praying with Bach
    • Why Mozart Matters
    • Choosing Joy
    • Audio and Video
    • Repertoire
  • Blogger
  • Contact
Search

Extraordinary Recordings #4: Grigory Sokolov Plays Chopin's Sonata #2

6/11/2017

Comments

 
What defines the mass following around Grigory Sokolov? For North Americans, part of the answer is in the pianist’s self-imposed isolation in Europe. Even when he refused to allow recordings to be released officially, old records plus plenty of YouTube videos gave a glimpse into a kind of piano playing rarely heard.
 
I had the good fortune to see Sokolov in recital in 2011. I was in Europe for a piano festival, followed by 2 weeks of backpacking on my own. I visited Cologne just to hear him perform Schumann and Bach (plus many encores) and it was well worth it. I still hear the perfect vocal right hand and pizzicato left hand of the slow movement of Bach’s Italian Concerto.
 
One reviewer has attempted to define the mystical quality behind Sokolov’s brilliance. He says that Sokolov sounds “at home” with each composer he plays, a sentiment I agree with.
​
But this follow-up I disagree with: “he somehow obliterates his own enormous musical personality by his occupation of the territory of the author he plays.” I’ve never done a blind test, but I would wager that I could tell Sokolov apart from other pianists if I did. It’s precisely because his musical personality shines through the notes left by the composer that I enjoy his artistry so much. He has a unique gift to reconcile a composer’s voice with his own.
 
And then one more statement I do agree with: “Sokolov’s first concern is always his relationship with his instrument.” He is first and foremost a pianist, in the best sense possible. He knows how to express music through the piano.
 
It’s well known that Sokolov doesn’t collaborate, whether in chamber music or concertos, at least not anymore. He’s often said that it’s too difficult to find a musical partner with similar musical sounds, not to mention, the economics of rehearsing an orchestra long enough to have a unified musical message.
 
So he plays solo piano, exclusively touring Europe with one program each year. Clearly he gets to know his program so well that once he’s performing publicly, he knows exactly how to make his music heard perfectly.
 
But that requires the perfect instrument. Sokolov is also known for working as his own piano technician. Spending hours alone in the concert hall before a recital, he will adjust the piano so that it responds exactly as he would like it to.
 
That might sound like ‘cheating’, manipulating the playing field so that he’s always playing with home-field advantage. But if you make that much effort not just to understand the technical work of adjusting piano mechanisms, but to know exactly what you want out of an instrument, why not utilize it?
 
So he’s truly someone engaged with what a piano is capable of musically, chooses a program which engages the piano best, and masters the small repertoire to create incredibly moving performances. To go a step further, all of his commercial recordings are live, unedited recordings. I don’t know if he’s ever stepped foot into a studio or had an audience hear a recording of his playing that was spliced together from multiple takes.
 
It was difficult to decide what recording to focus on, but I decided to look at Chopin’s 2nd Sonata, Op. 35. Chopin, being a pianist’s composer, and Sokolov, being a pianist’s pianist, sounds like the perfect combination.
 
Chopin of course took ample inspiration from the world of Italian bel canto opera, and wrote in such a way to best approximate the singing style on the least-singing instrument. The best Chopin singers surpass the piano’s percussive nature to create the impression of singing legato with the requisite balance of phrasing, dynamics and rubato. I’d like to suggest that Grigory Sokolov is uniquely qualified to find this balance because of his total engagement in the piano as an instrument.
 
Of course he sings throughout the first movement. The left hand is not overwhelming in the opening agitato theme and his nocturne impulses shine in the secondary theme. The second movement is as playful as the music allows, making the most of the changes of register, and the motivic repeated notes are never hammered. In the famous third movement he acquires the necessary bleak character, and even manages to make the piano sob at the sforzandos, or the left hand trills in the march section. He makes sense of the strange finale by adding color with the pedal and draws our ears closer by alluding to motives in his voicing.
 
I’d like to look most specifically at one spot in the Development section of the first movement, M. 137-153, heard at 5:24 of his recording. Here the agitato theme in the right hand is combined with the opening descending sixth octaves in the left hand. If you listen closely, there’s a slight hesitation in the right hand to give a moment longer to listen to the left hand. In that way, the left hand sounds full in tone because the sound has a moment to bloom, and we get to listen to the combination of the two themes.
 
Without that regular hesitation, the piano would sound completely homogenous, instead of heterogenous. Sokolov understands and hears how the sounds he makes at the piano will be perceived at his attack, and exactly how it will decay, and he manages every other musical decision around those basic realities. And because he works so closely with his instrument at each performance, he is able to guarantee the response that he wants. In this way, Sokolov ismuch unlike Glenn Gould who prized structure over the sound.
Comments

Extraordinary Recordings #1: Glenn Gould playing 10 Brahms Intermezzi

5/26/2017

Comments

 
    Built with ConvertKit
    Glenn Gould: the Bach specialist, master of the “Gould”berg Variations. But did you know that he recorded the complete Mozart Piano Sonatas? Chopin’s 3rd Sonata? Prokofiev’s 7th?

    Check them out-they are unlike any performance of the work you’ll ever hear. Take the Chopin example. The sonorous filigree in the transition to the second theme in movement 1 is played with a motoristic drive uncharacteristic of the composer. And while the second theme is surprisingly executed with plenty of bel canto style, the overall performance sounds dry and mechanical.
    Chopin is a composer ultimately focused on sound and poetry. Gould is a performer ultimately focused on structure.
     ​
    In this latter approach, the composer doesn’t matter so much as the construction of the piece.  How the notes were put together mattered more than the sounds they made, perhaps in the same way that a building would be judged whether it was functional, not how it looked. Says Kevin Bazzana in his book Glenn Gould: The Performer in the Work, ““Gould was concerned with musical expression but was motivated by musical structure.” (page 13, first emphasis mine, second in the original) The function could be innovative, but only because the structure first and foremost, was.
     
    Bazzana quotes fellow Bach specialist Rosalyn Tureck as saying: “In Bach’s music, the form and structure is of so abstract a nature on every level that it is not dependent on its costume of sonorities. Insistence on the employment of (period instruments) reduces the work of so universal a genius to a period piece…In Bach everything that the music is comes first, the sonorities are an accessory.” (page 21).
     
    This universality is essential, I think, to understanding Glenn Gould’s performance. It is a universality which truly opens the performer up to playing with extreme sensitivity to musicality and expression that’s inherent in the work. That sensitivity may not be inherent in the standard practice of a piece, thus we get to hear Gould’s unique style of playing (see his recording of Beethoven’s final 3 Piano Sonatas for an example of something strange that, I believe, ‘works’).
     
    So Gould, “could ‘let loose’ in performance only with music whose structure met his standards of idealism and logic, music that he could first justify rationally.” (page 35) Chopin, not focused on structure will never sound truly revelatory and natural in someone like Gould’s hands.
     
    And that brings us to Brahms. Glenn Gould recorded 10 Brahms Intermezzi early in his career, in 1960. (Later in his career, indeed one of his last recordings, he also recorded the Op. 10 Ballades and the Op. 79 Rhapsodies). These Intermezzi, I do believe, constitute the most perfect musical recordings in existence, and they are often overlooked in Gould’s output. At first, Brahms seems not the quintessential Gould composer, especially given his controversial performance with Leonard Bernstein of the first concerto.
     
    But when we remember Brahms’s classicist bent, his love of Bach and Renaissance polyphony, his dedication to absolute music, it makes sense. These short forms (as opposed to the earlier Brahms Sonatas and Variations which Gould decried as “pianist’s music”) fit his temperament perfectly.
     
    On these pieces Gould himself says, “I have captured, I think, an atmosphere of improvisation which I don’t believe has ever been represented in Brahms recordings before…total introversion, with brief outbursts of searing pain culminating in long stretches of muted grief…” Or, in his words, these are the ‘sexiest’ recordings ever made (these quotes from the liner notes of this other volume of the recordings).
     
    Call it sexy or not, the Intermezzi are performed with incredible attention to expression of the melodic line, harmonic shaping, rubato and structural drama. Given the way he shapes and connects melodies or layers the polyphony, I truly believe that Gould could hear with better detail than a typical musician. Like Gould’s Bach, every line in these pieces sounds independent and musical. I point your attention to the counter melody on the repeat in the B-section of Op. 118 no. 2 and when the melody returns in the minor a few phrases later. I hesitate to analyze much further because of the perfection I hear, these recordings just speak for themselves.
     
    He has a way of balancing different lines to make us listen to something different every few measures, without losing what we were listening to before. He magically forces us to listen polyphonically. Clearly Gould was not a dry, mechanical performer, but was capable of intense romanticism in his playing. We hear it clearly in these Brahms recordings, evidently just because by looking at the structure first, he could see the beauty inside the functional, rational architecture that he simply doesn’t see when the elements are reversed in something like Chopin. ​
    Comments
        Built with ConvertKit
        Sign up for my e-mail list and receive my free guide "Listening to the Mozart Piano Sonatas

        ​"Modern performers seem to regard their performances as texts rather than acts, and to prepare for them with the same goal as present-day textual editors: to clear away accretions. Not that this is not a laudable and necessary step; but what is an ultimate step for an editor should be only a first step for a performer, as the very temporal relationship between the functions of editing and performing already suggests." -Richard Taruskin, ​Text and Act

        Archives

        March 2021
        November 2018
        October 2018
        September 2018
        August 2018
        July 2018
        June 2018
        May 2018
        April 2018
        March 2018
        November 2017
        October 2017
        September 2017
        August 2017
        July 2017
        June 2017
        May 2017
        April 2017
        July 2016
        June 2016
        May 2016
        June 2012
        January 2012
        December 2011

        Categories

        All
        Alex Ross
        Amy Beach
        Artistic Messages
        Artistry
        Audio
        Bach
        Best Practices
        Boring
        Chamber Music
        Chiara
        Chopin
        Clapping
        Cliburn Competition Report
        Competitions
        Concert Reflections
        Contemporary Music
        Creativity
        Enjoying
        Extraordinary Recordings
        Glenn Gould
        Influential Books
        Intellectual
        Learning
        Listening
        Liszt
        Messiaen
        Mozart In A Month
        Nature
        Performance Practice
        Performance Traditions
        Pianistic Intentions
        Piano Business
        Practicing
        Richard Dare
        Richard Taruskin
        Rising Stars
        Serialism
        Subjectivity
        Teacher Sayings
        Teaching
        Textual Fidelity
        Time
        Video

        RSS Feed

      Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
      • Home
      • Biography
      • Pianist
        • Praying with Bach
        • Why Mozart Matters
        • Choosing Joy
        • Audio and Video
        • Repertoire
      • Blogger
      • Contact