JEFF MANCHUR: PIANIST
  • Home
  • Biography
  • News and Updates
  • Pianist
    • Mozart in a Month
    • Choosing Joy
    • Audio and Video
    • Repertoire
  • Praying with Bach
  • Blogger
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Biography
  • News and Updates
  • Pianist
    • Mozart in a Month
    • Choosing Joy
    • Audio and Video
    • Repertoire
  • Praying with Bach
  • Blogger
  • Contact
Search

Influential Books: Stephen Covey's "7 Habits of Highly Effective People"

4/24/2018

Comments

 
I don't recall how I first came across this book, whether someone recommended it to me, or why in particular I felt the need to read it. But 7 Habits of Highly Effective People became one of the most influential books I ever read.

I never even read the whole thing. I think I read only the first 3 Habits, but they were transformative to me, and I think they have strong implications for musicians and performers.

My main takeaway from this book was that we give power over our lives to other people. When we care about what they think of us, and when we care about what others think about us. When we think a peer or colleague must be spending their waking hours looking for our mistakes and awaiting our downfall.

Before I read this book, I used to think that as I walked down the street, people passing me by were judging what I looked like, how I walked, what facial expression I had. Presumably at some point in my life, I learned that some, one, person was indeed judging me in this way. But this book revealed a secret:

Almost no one is thinking about me, because they're too busy thinking about themselves. If everyone is worried about what other people think about them, they don't have time to actually think about other people. All of this worrying is for nothing. Anyone who's in on the secret has so much freedom to take care of themselves. And it's when we are free of this fear that we get to build ourselves up to love and serve others.

This doesn't mean we shouldn't be immune to criticism or learning from those wiser  and more experienced than us. We should be open to careful and constructive moments of learning, which will happen to us constantly. Not allowing others to control our lives means understanding the differences between judgment and well-intentioned criticism. 

For pianists, we should absolutely seek out other teachers who want us to grow as  artists. But by rejecting the judgement of others, we can be free to develop as individuals, true to the music we understand historically, theoretically and personally. 
Comments

Influential Books #5: Beyond Talent & The Savvy Musician

8/2/2017

Comments

 
​“With a narrow view of success, musicians unconsciously limited their careers, their satisfaction, and their professional fulfillment.” (Beeching, page 6)
I always wanted to be a college professor of music.
 
Not just because that’s the expected path of many college students majoring in music performance. It’s hard to escape the perception that music degrees are factories to take you from a B.Mus, to a M.Mus, to a DMA, to become college faculty to teach students in a B.Mus and continue the cycle.
 
But I always intently wanted to teach music at a high level. From the day of my first undergraduate audition, after my memory collapsed in my Bach Prelude and Fugue, till the day I received my doctoral hood, I wanted to dig into the intricacies of performance. I’ve always been fascinated by concert repertoire, and performance styles. At the same time, I was mystified about how to break down these pianistic and musical concepts that I knew so well to help a beginning piano student learn them. It would seem only natural to teach at a University.
My career has gone a different direction since finishing my DMA, and I will expand on the interim 2 years in a series beginning later this month. But others opportunities have come my way. It turns out I love teaching young children, even beginners, when I’m working through the Suzuki method. I have chances to collaborate and teach at BGSU, my alma mater. And now I’m able to focus on so many areas that I might not have if I was in a full time academic position: dreaming up new recital programs and projects, developing book ideas, learning about social media, marketing and entrepreneurship, and of course, blogging.
​

After taking a break from pursuing the academic career, slightly over a year ago now, my conceptualization of my career has changed dramatically, and though I may attempt to return to higher ed full time, I’m beyond excited and determined to create my own infrastructure to build a career in classical music.
 
----------
 
But you don’t learn how to do that in school. There’s so many other things to learn, and why not learn exactly what your professors specialize in? Education isn't all about getting a job. Luckily there are so many resources out there to figure it out.
 
These two books have helped me adjust my expectations and point me in the direction of the building my own career. They are very similar, and neither is better than the other. I could not recommend reading one or the other, I urge you to read both. The more we read different interpretations of similar ideas, the more we will be able to apply those ideas to our own lives.
 
Both books urge you to think beyond the basic talent you need for success. (Of course, based on my previous blog post, I use the word ‘talent’ very loosely!) Both books assume you have that talent, and urge you to consider that your talent alone does not define you. There are so many talented people trying to do the same thing you are. You have to find, not just what makes you special, but how you can thrive in the environment you live in, along with the people you know.
 
Both deal with the tricky financial side of the equation. Of course we need to make a living. There are so many factors to consider that finances for musicians could be a book series in and of itself. But these books lead us to start asking the right questions, to seek the answers we need.
 
Both teach you ways to develop projects, promote yourself, build an identity, and how to network and help others. Both emphasize that ‘getting ahead’ can never be a matter of pushing others down; we benefit most from helping others get ahead. This is the most exciting factor for me. Rather than looking for my next big break, why not looking for the value I can add to other people’s lives and careers, and appreciate what value others give to me.
 
While I’ve focused on books in this blog series, I would be remiss not to mention two other resources:The Marketed Musician, a podcast and online course platform; and The Entrepreneurial Musician podcast. Both are constant inspirations to me, and have helped sort out and correct all of the ideas I’m working through these days!
​“But to become excellent, all the reading, studying, and theorizing in the world is simply not enough. The key? Just do it. Jump in, get your hands wet, be willing to make some mistakes along the way, and stick with it. Many musicians become so obsessed with the idea of excellence, they refuse to even try anything that doesn’t guarantee 100% success. As a result, ironically, their growth is stunted.” (Cutler, pg. 28)
Not just to create opportunities for ourselves to make a living, but an entrepreneurial mindset, expanding the opportunities available to us with musical training alone, is imperative to be ambassadors for classical music.
 
It’s easy to be pessimistic about the state of classical music today. We could talk about declining CD sales, greying audiences, growing numbers of competitors for a shrinking number of positions.
 
But what else has changed? Technology has advanced so much that any individual can record their work with just a little financial investment. Media barriers have disappeared so that we can send our work out into the world with ease.
 
We don’t need to look for affirmation from any institution, be it government, academia or concert promoters. Towards the end of my DMA, I came to a greater peace with the idea that I might not be a professor. In fact, I might not make my living in music at all. But I would always be a musician. Once you’ve trained and developed an artistic voice, you’ll never lose it.
 
In order to reestablish classical music in the culture, we don’t just need people to reinforce the traditions of classical music which have witnessed the decline of its impact. We don’t have to throw out those institutions and traditions either, but we can expand their reach, we can influence non-musicians with our expertise in our day-to-day lives, and find new ways to expand our sphere of influence. 


​​​**This post contains affiliate links. While I may receive a small compensation if you purchase any of the products mentioned, the words used to promote them are completely genuine and offered regardless of any personal earnings**

Comments

Influential Books #4: Daniel Coyle's "The Talent Code"

7/26/2017

Comments

 
"​There’s no such thing as talent."
Thus far I’ve started each post in this series with a quote from the book, a quote that captures the essence of the week’s subject.
 
The quote above is from me.
 
It’s a controversial statement for many people, not least of which, some of my favorite people in the world. But I believe in that quote because as I survey my pianistic life so far, I surmise that I am living proof that what we tend to call ‘talents’ are learned skills, not genetic predispositions.

​I was not drawn to the piano when I was young. My parents started my brother, 2 years older than me, with lessons when he was 6. I suppose I was aware that I would follow soon enough, and was eager to begin copying him. But I wasn’t exceptional. In fact, despite those 2 years of priming, my brother always scored higher on his graded examinations than I did.
But I stuck with it longer. I moved to a new teacher when I was 13 who, step-by-step, began to make changes to my playing. No longer were piano lessons a matter of learning notes and rhythms correctly while holding my wrists up. How I approached the keys, listening to the sounds I made, being expressive, thinking about historical contexts and incorporating theoretical analysis. All of these things were instilled in me.
 
At some point I began to be interested in classical music at a higher level and I decided to pursue it in my post-secondary education. I’d had some success in local competitions, but despite my excellent teacher in high school, I had a long way to go to catch up to students who had serious teachers like her from their first lesson. At University I was a small fish in a small pond, and as I’ve discussed in other posts, while the pond grew bigger around me, I had a hard time keeping up.
  
----------
 
Early in The Talent Code, Daniel Coyle relates a story of a British soccer coach studying soccer training grounds for young players. Rather than playing the normal game but with great passion and natural skill, Brazilians were obsessed with a version of soccer “played inside a phone booth and dosed with amphetamines.” (pg. 25). Congregating on a tiny field, with a heavy, dull ball, the pace was much faster than soccer. Player’s reactions were much quicker given these constrictions, and the ball moves around more often.
 
Transfer someone who has learned to manage in this game to the expanse of a soccer field and the ease of a soccer ball while keeping the quick decision making ability and you’ve got the makings of a great soccer player.
 
Coyle focuses much of his book studying the phenomenon of deep practice. When you practice a skill just beyond what you’re presently capable of, you are more likely to succeed. The reward is in trying, failing, trying again until it’s easier. It’s how our neurological system is built, making connections in our brain between foreign ideas then reinforcing.
 
Even Mozart was likely exposed to enough music that he achieved deep practice from a very early age. Up to the time he was touted as a child prodigy, he still amassed an impressive amount of deep practice to build the illusion of natural talent. And make no mistake, as impressive as he was at a young age, the true genius of Mozart wouldn’t come for many more years. ​
​“When you’re practicing deeply, the world’s usual rules are suspended. You use time more efficiently. Your small efforts produce big, lasting results. You have positioned yourself at a place of leverage where you can capture failure and turn it into skills. The trick is to choose a goal just beyond your present abilities; to target the struggle. Thrashing blindly doesn’t help. Reaching does.” (page 19)
​Think back to my post about The Perfect Wrong Note. The musical voice that was hidden behind weak technique and nerves might suggest to the reader that my musical side was natural, the technical learned, but that I still had a natural talent for expressivity.
 
I don’t think so. The longer I was with my high school teacher, the more of a classical nerd I became. I read message boards and though I had no claim to authority, entered vehement arguments about whether Beethoven was a classical or a romantic composer. I downloaded scores and recordings on my parent’s dial-up internet (I grew up on a farm). I bought scores if I won some extra money in the local music festival, or asked for scores as gifts. I could name opus numbers, and keys of all Beethoven piano sonatas before I’d heard more than a couple.
 
My point is that despite limited resources, I slowly fell into a greater study of classical music, consuming as much as I could. My musical voice was learned through a process, it happened to develop much before my technical abilities caught up.
 
I’m more encouraged in life by disparaging the word talent. I think of all the things I am not good at: cooking (other than a few ‘specialties’), hammering nails, auto mechanics. Sometimes these deficiencies are frustrating, but if push came to shove, I’d be able to pick up the skills necessary with lots of trial and error. Or I think about all the habits I’ve instilled over the years: Any of my success has been due to changing my lifestyle from what always felt natural. I used to think I was a night owl, practicing until 1 or 2 AM whenever I could. Then out of necessity to get access to a practice room, I switched to become an earlier and earlier riser, realizing that the morning hours were far more productive than endless nighttime ones. I even get up at least an hour earlier than I ever need to, because I enjoy sitting with my coffee before I have to do anything else.
 
Sure, we all have preferences, but those change and evolve despite how natural or assured our old preferences felt. I used to despise the same contemporary music I now love, and perform often. I learned to love it. While no one has time to learn everything, and sometimes new skills come with insurmountable odds, we are far more capable than we give ourselves credit for. 


​​​**This post contains affiliate links. While I may receive a small compensation if you purchase any of the products mentioned, the words used to promote them are completely genuine and offered regardless of any personal earnings**
Comments

Influential Books #3: After the Golden Age

7/19/2017

Comments

 
"​At the heart of romantic pianism remains the idea that the performer, not the composer, is the center of interest."
I’ve always been attracted to music that very few people play. In my undergrad, I discovered the concert music Erich Wolfgang Korngold, better known for his later film scores, but a virtuoso pianist himself. I played his Don Quixote suite on my senior recital, a work from his youth which betrayed an incredible amount of narrative and compositional ingenuity.
 
I was fascinated to discover Beethoven’s published Fantasy, or Polonaise; Chopin’s Bolero or Allegro de Concert; Brahms’s Scherzo. Rarely heard works by famous excited me and although the repertoire I played then remained fairly standard, I was constantly looking for the next rare find.
 

Initially, I may have been aiming to hide flaws in my playing. As I spoke of my undergraduate years inthe first blog in this series, my facility lagged behind my enthusiasm for the piano for several years of advanced study. Playing “standard” but rarely heard repertoire masked my flaws by its novelty.
 
But as my technique improved, I realized another draw to this music: I didn’t like how many people played the standard repertoire. And if my own musical ideas weren’t widely accepted, I could at least more easily let my imagination run freely where few people knew the music.
 
I had the good fortune during my masters degree to study classical performance practice at the modern piano. Experimenting with the fortepiano, even playing for the legendary Malcolm Bilson in a masterclass, opened my eyes to the fact that not all of our presumed traditions today are in fact what was intended by the composer.
 
But it was Kenneth Hamilton’s After the Golden Age which truly opened my ears to a sound world, a style of playing, which truly felt natural for my own intellect and tastes.
 
----------
 
How do we know what a piece of music is supposed to sound like? Interpreting a piece of music requires a lot of assumptions, interpretational ideas that we take for granted. After the Golden Age challenges a lot of those assumptions.
 
We often speak today of the “Golden Age of piano playing”, but when it comes down to it, we’re often not sure what that actually means. We fail to acknowledge that pianists of the time—say the mid nineteenth century into the early twentieth century—had practices and authorities that we don’t recognize today:

  1. The serious solo recital only gradually came into existence during this time, and the silent, attentive audience even later;
  2. Pianists of this time were themselves composers and improvisors and they applied those skills even in the role of performer of someone else’s text;
  3. They regularly utilized performance techniques, forms of rubato, and un-notated forms of expression, at their individual whim and taste.
 
The character and legendary stature of Liszt, the performer and composer, looms large throughout the book. Hamilton’s goal isn’t to allow unfettered recompositional license when interpreting works of the past, but we shouldn’t dismiss unfamiliar performance traditions—those heard in plenty on the earliest recordings of pianists who were trained in the nineteenth century—as scandalous: Referring to the editor in lavish performance editions:
"Nowadays we need not try to grasp Beethoven’s meaning while being verbally bullied by Bulow, or Bach’s while being harangued by Busoni. But we could, while not denying the indispensable value of the urtext back-to basics approach, also embrace a tolerant position and treat the later performance history of music as offering viable options to present and future players, rather than simply constituting a sad catalog of corruption.” (pg. 280)
​After the Golden Age not only introduced me to new expressive techniques in my playing, but challenged my ears, and indeed my intellect, to reformulate how I approached piano playing. For the first time I listened to old pianists, students of Liszt, and was amazed by what I heard. Their playing sounded original, the pieces I thought I knew inside and out felt brand new, the boring phrases sprung to life. My imagination was fueled, wondering what Liszt or Chopin would have sounded like themselves, cherishing this aural link to classical music masters.
 
And this book ignited a youthful, and sometimes misguided, passion to be different. So while Hamilton fueled my love for piano music from the nineteenth century, he also pushed me specialize in music from the late twentieth century as well as the modern day.
 
My primary reason for attending the doctorate in Contemporary Music at Bowling Green State University was not primarily for the love of new music. Though I grew to cherish new music, I first and foremost wanted to develop my artistry in a body of repertoire that did not have an established performance tradition.
 
The resistance to the traditions illuminated in After the Golden Age taught me to place myself in a position similar to these old piano recordings that I loved. By working with living composers, I could be an active part in the creation of musical masterpieces. In building an authority in this way, I hope to justify my playing upon my return to the traditional repertoire…But more on that in the fall!


​​​**This post contains affiliate links. While I may receive a small compensation if you purchase any of the products mentioned, the words used to promote them are completely genuine and offered regardless of any personal earnings**
Comments

Influential Books #2: Csikszentmihalyi's "Creativity"

7/12/2017

Comments

 
​“…a genuinely creative accomplishment is almost never the result of a sudden insight, a lightbulb flashing on in the dark, but comes after years of hard work.”
I’ve never liked the advice ‘think outside the box’. It seems to violate so many cultural, scientific and artistic norms.
 
The saying is so often equated with new age, hokey, half-truth science. Feel good religion. ‘Your path to enlightenment is to remove yourself from the world.’ But I’m in the world no matter how much I try not to be.
 
It puts so much pressure on me to be different. To come up with the next big thing. To spontaneously combust a brand new idea. What if I don’t like being that different?

​You’re supposed to follow your own path, which I guess means building your own road. Plough your own field. Build your own castle. But I don’t know how to build all these things from scratch, and I don’t want to leave my friends and family behind.
 
Why study history, learn manners and language, social decency and behavior? If we’re supposed to think outside of one box, one area of our lives, why not all others? How do I know when difference becomes a virtue and same becomes a burden?
 
‘Think outside the box’ is lazy advice and false logic. It’s hard to create something meaningful without having some preexisting knowledge on which your meaningful creation is based. People crave context, as well as innovation and these two things need not be mutually exclusive.
 
Thinking outside the box values an unknown other just because it’s on the outside, without acknowledging the value of the box itself. After all, if you were in the box, and able to create something outside of it, doesn’t the box have something left to offer? Should we just throw away the box completely?
 
I’ve never been comfortable with throwing out all the rules. I’ve never been comfortable with disregarding history, objective study and demonstrable knowledge. There’s a reason we study the music of the classical canon; not because that’s where we need to focus on all our time, but because the levers of history, as prejudiced and exclusionary as they have been, have deemed some repertoire vitally important. In order to look at what’s been excluded, or what’s possible in the future, we need to know what general consensus call important now, and by what criteria we measure that by.
 
All musicians want to be creative, but only the most nihilistic art can be created outside the box, and even then, there’s no guarantee that your audience will understand your performance outside of the box themselves. So where does creativity come from?

-------
 
Social psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi has answers. Known for his concept of ‘flow’ in expertise (I highly advise studying his book on that subject as well), he also pursued an in-depth study on the state of creativity. How to experts who truly create something new discover and invent new ideas in their domain? Do they truly work outside the box, or in it?
 
To study this, Csikszentmihalyi and his team performed an elaborate long-term study of individuals at the top of their domain, be it the arts, government, business or science. These individuals have been in their field for decades and are intimately and actively engaged in it. After selection, these individuals were interviewed and their body of work analyzed to cull hints at the source of their creativity. In doing so, he created rules and relationships which point towards the source of innovation, not just for the most genius in the world, but all artistic practitioners. 
“…creativity results from the interaction of a system composed of three elements: a culture that contains symbolic rules, a person who brings novelty into the symbolic domain, and a field of experts who recognize and validate the innovation.” (page 6)
Lesson 1 is that nothing new is created in a vacuum. One cannot create without being an expert in a domain, to know the ‘rules’, the state of knowledge, the acts and practices on which all operate.
 
Lesson 2 is that after demonstrating this knowledge, one can add something to the existing knowledge that is new, original and genuine. Creativity is always tied to what came before, an outgrowth (think of creativity like a giant scrabble game!).
 
Lesson 3 is that your creative creation must be recognizable to others in the field. Scientific study is predicated on, among other things, replicable tests. If your method of testing cannot be repeated and the same results attained, you cannot say your conclusion is truth. Replication in any field is necessary so that your creation can be useful to others.
 
Lesson 3, then, circles back to lesson 1. Someone else might take over the body of work in your field, including your creation, and add more. In my doctoral studies, I finally realized that the more you learn, the more you know what’s left to know. Being an expert isn’t about having all the answers, it’s about knowing how to ask the right questions that expands creativity, then, knowing how to pursue answers to those questions.
 
----------
 
I once heard the tubist and podcaster Andrew Hitz amend the ‘think outside the box’ statement to something closer to ‘expand the box instead’. Csikszentmihalyi would agree.
 
As musicians, this has any number of applications. For Hitz, his focus on entrepreneurial ventures for musicians means that we don’t have to create brand new avenues for our music to be heard, but we should try to find better utilize the avenues that already exist. We don’t have to create new audiences out of thin air, but we should be focused on bettering the experience of those who already listen to us.
 
My focus with this blog is to study what makes great, individual piano performances. But an intentional pianist isn’t ignorant of performers who came before, and doesn’t play interpretations that can’t be defended with intellectual honesty. My goal isn’t to be different then everybody else. Become an expert and know the expectations with a piece you’re learning. Then you can be creative.
 
Think for yourself. If you come up with a way of playing a piece that you absolutely believe in, do it your way. If you trust your musical instincts are based on listening, reading, and years of playing with the correction of creative masters, then you can rest assured that the way you want to play is justified. You can know that you’re being a true creative pianist, expanding the knowledge and creativity that came before. 

Next week, Influential Books hearkens back to my Extraordinary Recordings series, by studying The Great Pianists​. 

​​**This post contains affiliate links. While I may receive a small compensation if you purchase any of the products mentioned, the words used to promote them are completely genuine and offered regardless of any personal earnings**
Comments

Influential Books #1: William Westney's "The Perfect Wrong Note"

7/5/2017

Comments

 
“Stop telling your hand what it ought to do. Find out what it is doing.”
​
It’s September of 2007, and I’m entering the fourth year of my undergraduate degree in piano performance. Never a virtuoso pianist, I initially failed to earn a place in the performance program and thus would be finishing my degree in 5 years. I’d been working hard and with the help of my teacher, made progress.
 
But there was still a hump that I could not overcome. I had a strong desire to play fluidly, with confident virtuosity and musical artistry, but something often got in the way. My strong musical ideas and intentions couldn’t always get through, my technique suffered, especially in performance.
I had one epiphany when I attended a summer festival earlier that summer. An excellent program with all kinds of strong and confident performers, the faculty were even more impressive teachers and performers. I was both inspired and humbled. Ultimately, I decided that summer that my repertoire plans and performance goals for the forthcoming year were too ambitious and that I had to go back to the basics.
 
I needed to play a concerto recital as part of my degree requirements, so I began learning Mozart’s K 467—a work with intricate passage work requiring just the attention to detail, both technical and musical, that I needed. At the same time, I was assigned a chamber group to play Franck’s Piano Quintet, which required a great romantic virtuosity and the technical approach to make the piano sound like an organ.
 
As luck would have it, one of my chamber music coaches, in a chance conversation, recommended a book he had recently read and thought so highly of that he made sure the campus bookstore carried a few copies. Rather down on myself as a performer, I checked it out and my life was changed forever. The book was William Westney’s The Perfect Wrong Note.
 
----------
 
Early in the book, Westney writes of an illuminating experience he had playing a Beethoven sonata for a master teacher. Re-working the first measure over and over again, the teacher demonstrated, sang, conducted until finally applauding Westney for playing it correctly. Even now, no longer a student, Westney recalls, “I had no idea what made that repetition different from all the others. All I knew was that he loved it, because (presumably) that’s just how he would play it himself.” (pg. 42)
 
Westney suggests that there are dangers in the way music is traditionally taught. Students get bored and quit. Students learn to copy rather than create. Students are passive not active. Students gloss over instead of fixing their mistakes.
 
Mistakes end up being the main focal point of the book. Wrong notes can be perfect because they are information. Mistakes tell us what we need to work on, and thus, direct what we do in the practice room. Practicing should proceed in such a way that we try to make mistakes.
 

“Let’s say you miss a note in the fourth measure. Fine. That note now becomes the last note of a practice segment. Go back a few notes, enough to create some context, and repeat enough times for your hand to teach itself the distances involved. Let your body figure it out in its own way, and that may take several repetitions to happen…The idea is to let it happen, not make it happen.” (pg. 87)
The benefits of this approach are numerous: An engaged attitude, really listening to yourself, which leads to a more engaging and original performance. A secure physical memory of the piece you’re learning. Faster learning since you don’t have to address the same mistakes over again. More awareness of how to fix mistakes which makes you a better teacher of yourself and others.
 
Westney suggests practicing with big energy, an intentional approach to your performance. Here the opening quote is relevant, “Stop telling your hand what it ought to do. Find out what it is doing.” This is by Eloise Ristad, an influence on Westney, in her related book A Soprano on her Head. The practicing suggested here will not sound pretty for a long time but that’s okay. We don’t practice to impress anyone, we’re alone in the practice room anyway. If we are worried about sounding good all the time in the practice room, we are more concerned with satisfying our own ego than creating an artistic product. 

----------

The Perfect Wrong Note
turned out to be an extraordinary influence on my playing. I truly believe that I would not have progressed beyond my bachelor’s degree had I not read it. This book allowed my inner musicality to finally be heard. It accelerated the path to growing my technique and my artistry which made me more receptive to my teachers and coaches.
 
Through this book, I revolutionized my practicing. I learned how to apply all of the practice tips I’d heard over the years in such a way that they were transformative, rather than utilitarian. I learned to self-analyze small segments of my work, zoom in and address the individual problem I was having rather than ignore mistakes and hope they disappeared on the next run-through. I learned to listen to myself and consider whether I was happy with my performance or not. I learned to be confident in my playing and interpretations. I learned how to give convincing, effective performances of Mozart’s Concerto K 467 and Franck’s Piano Quintet and how to prepare myself to perform even more difficult works with greater maturity and fluency.
 
None of these achievements were immediate, but the book engaged me in a process which brought far more success than I had found previously. I’d be skeptical of quick fixes. We grow and change as musicians (and people) so much, constantly, that anything that creates a quick fix is likely not going to benefit you in the future, it just happened to help in that moment. Westney’s book continues to engage my work as a performer and teacher today.
 
I do not intend for this series to be an advertisement for my own work, but if you are intrigued by this book and would like to read further into the practical lessons I’ve learned from it, you’re in luck! Over the years I developed an in-depth document that chronicles many of the practical tips and the mental mindset I’ve developed as a result of this book. I’ve also created a series of videos, which I will always be adding to, to demonstrate my own work.
 
I’ve turned this document into an e-book, ”Pianist’s Guide to Practicing” which you can get for FREE, just by signing up to my e-mail list. By doing so, you can get the book and stay closer in touch with my work as a blogger, pianist and teacher. Check out this link or see the signup form in the sidebar at the top of this page.
 
Next in the Influential Books series I’ll be looking at…Creativity. 



​**This post contains affiliate links. While I may receive a small compensation if you purchase any of the products mentioned, the words used to promote them are completely genuine and offered regardless of any personal earnings**
Comments
      Built with ConvertKit
      Sign up for my e-mail list and receive my free guide "Listening to the Mozart Piano Sonatas

      ​"Modern performers seem to regard their performances as texts rather than acts, and to prepare for them with the same goal as present-day textual editors: to clear away accretions. Not that this is not a laudable and necessary step; but what is an ultimate step for an editor should be only a first step for a performer, as the very temporal relationship between the functions of editing and performing already suggests." -Richard Taruskin, ​Text and Act

      Archives

      March 2021
      November 2018
      October 2018
      September 2018
      August 2018
      July 2018
      June 2018
      May 2018
      April 2018
      March 2018
      November 2017
      October 2017
      September 2017
      August 2017
      July 2017
      June 2017
      May 2017
      April 2017
      July 2016
      June 2016
      May 2016
      June 2012
      January 2012
      December 2011

      Categories

      All
      Alex Ross
      Amy Beach
      Artistic Messages
      Artistry
      Audio
      Bach
      Best Practices
      Boring
      Chamber Music
      Chiara
      Chopin
      Clapping
      Cliburn Competition Report
      Competitions
      Concert Reflections
      Contemporary Music
      Creativity
      Enjoying
      Extraordinary Recordings
      Glenn Gould
      Influential Books
      Intellectual
      Learning
      Listening
      Liszt
      Messiaen
      Mozart In A Month
      Nature
      Performance Practice
      Performance Traditions
      Pianistic Intentions
      Piano Business
      Practicing
      Richard Dare
      Richard Taruskin
      Rising Stars
      Serialism
      Subjectivity
      Teacher Sayings
      Teaching
      Textual Fidelity
      Time
      Video

      RSS Feed

    Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
    • Home
    • Biography
    • News and Updates
    • Pianist
      • Mozart in a Month
      • Choosing Joy
      • Audio and Video
      • Repertoire
    • Praying with Bach
    • Blogger
    • Contact